Judge tells DEA to let Prof grow marijuana
Concluding that there is an inadequate supply of marijuana for medical research, an administrative law judge has recommended to the Drug Enforcement Administration that it grant a Massachusetts professor’s application to grow the drug in bulk.The judge’s ruling is nonbinding. But officials at the American Civil Liberties Union hope that the recommendation to grant the application of Professor Lyle Craker will eventually lead to more research into the use of marijuana for medicinal purposes.
In June 2001, Craker submitted an application as a marijuana manufacturer to the DEA. However, the federal government limits the growing of marijuana available for clinical research to one source, the University of Mississippi.
Federal officials said that Craker’s university, the University of Massachusetts Amherst, is free to compete for the next contract to produce research-grade marijuana for the United States. But there was no basis to add another producer.
The company that wants to fund Craker’s facility for growing marijuana countered that researchers are not getting the quantity or the quality of marijuana needed to conduct research that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration.
The DEA contacted researchers and determined otherwise, so hearings were held in August and December of 2006 as Craker pursued the case. He got help from the ACLU along the way.
The administrative law judge, Mary Ellen Bittner, concluded Monday that granting Craker’s application would be in the public interest. Among the reasons she cited were inadequate competition and an inadequate supply of marijuana for research purposes.
Steve Robertson, a spokesman for DEA, said Monday night the agency is reviewing Bittner’s decision and would have no immediate comment. The DEA administrator, Karen Tandy, retains final authority to decide on the application.
“I hope that Administrator Tandy abides by the decision and grants me the opportunity to do my job unimpeded by drug war politics,” Craker said in a statement distributed by the ACLU.

Don’t hold your breath, Craker. The DEA is not interested in what is right or what is fair - it cares only about power and budget.
The DEA has shown a disdain for democracy with its reaction to Prop 215. It has demonstrated a total disregard for human decency by shoving machine guns in the faces of terminal cancer patients during raids on dispensaries. When it comes to marijuana, it is unlikely the DEA will suddenly bow its head and take orders from an administrative law judge. To reign in these rogue cops would take an order from the President.
We should expect one.
In 1999, a reporter in Seattle asked candidate George Bush what he thought of medical marijuana. “I believe each state can choose that decision as they so choose,” he answered. As the DEA is an executive agency, the President should order that it stand down in the face of medical marijuana and respect the will of the people. President Bush should lead in the area of states’ rights. He should walk his talk.
To do anything less would be a colossal flip-flop.
Thank you for reading this post. You can now Leave A Comment (0) or Leave A Trackback.
Post Info
This entry was posted on Monday, February 12th, 2007 and is filed under Medical Marijuana, Politics, Massachusetts.You can follow any responses to this entry through the Comments Feed. You can Leave A Comment, or A Trackback.
Previous Post: One billion tax dollars to jail potheads »
Next Post: Scientists find marijuana works for pain »
- On Marijuana’s Sister Site
- Noam Chomsky on Marijuana
- Why do they hate us?
- Captain America abuses woman, destroys marijuana
- Man driven to marijuana by dangerous card game
- Connoisseurs of Cannabis
- An inconvenient truth about smoking marijuana
- A Child’s Garden of Grass 3
- A Child’s Garden of Grass 2
- A Child’s Garden of Grass
